In honor of the defeat of the Muslim invaders of France by Frankish king Charles "The Hammer" Martel, I'm reprinting a post from the blog Arthur's Hall of Viking Manliness. The piece was originally posted in February but is most appropriate for today, October 10, the nearly 1300th anniversary of The Hammer's historic victory over the real infidels. Read and be inspired to continue the fight against Mohammed's insatiable horde.
Arthur's Man Of The Month: Charles Martel
[On October 10], 732 [AD] a major event took place that shaped the world we live in. In fact, it may have been one of the [most] important events in the course of Western [Christian] Civilization. Yet...I'm guessing that 99% of you have no clue what I'm talking about, which is why I bring it up. The event I am alluding to is the Battle of Tours [where] the forces of Frankish king Charles "The Hammer" Martel defeated the boy raping Muslim invaders who'd set their sites on Continental Europe after subduing the pussy Spaniards.
It is hard to overstate the importance of this victory. The goat herding hordes had already turned Spain into a Muslim nation and were set on conquering the rest of Europe. Obviously, had they been successful it is possible that I would be praising Mohammed and his patron saint Obama...but because of men like Martel, the truth can still be told.
We all know that the Muslims would've never had a chance against the Germanic folk in the north of Europe, but Martel and his men were the first to halt the advance of the Muslims in Europe. He must be turning over in his grave at this point, seeing the destruction of the continent...culture, [and Faith] that he helped save nearly 1300 years ago. The story of "The Hammer" should be told all over Europe to inspire a sense of pride in being European. Modern Euros are such disgraceful pussies that they are literally welcoming their own extinction and everyone knows it but them. They are an insult to their ancestors, the ancestors who created this world and everything that is good on the planet Earth. My disgust for the modern people of Continental Europe knows little bounds. But back to Martel...
Charles Martel was born in [what is now] Belgium to a local leader and a concubine. He was said to have been a powerfully built man. His early career as a military leader foreshadowed his tactical genius. His first major victory was one with an army [that] was far smaller [than the opposing army], and he used tactics like "feigned retreat" that were new to European warfare. His attacks were always coordinated to happen in places and times that were unexpected to the opposing force. Another unusual trait of Martel was his fairness after scouring victory. Dark Ages Europe was beset with cruelty; vengeance, sacking, pillaging, and widespread rape were the norm for a victorious force. Martel would have none of that. He would generally allow the losing commanders to leave in peace.
After capturing power of much of the Frankish Kingdom in 718, [Martel] set out against the [Germans], who had continually been a nuisance, as the Romans found out 300 years earlier. [Martel] did something that the Romans could never do...he defeated the Germans at Teutoberg Forest, the site of an epic massacre of three Roman legions. Later in his reign, he subdued southern Germany, and the Frankish Kingdom at that point encompassed nearly all of what is now Germany, as well as Holland, Belgium, and most of France. South and east of the Frankish strongholds the Muslims were starting to invade southern Gaul (France) and Martel realized that he needed a full time...professional army to defeat the forces of the Emir of Cordoba. He seized Church lands and treasure in order to pay his troops so that they could train year round. An excellent decision but a difficult one, [for] at the time the Church was all powerful. His actions were possible grounds for excommunication, but because he is the type of man we are to celebrate...he did not care.
The Battle of Tours is seen as a "macrohistorical" event, literally meaning that the history of the world could've been altered had the outcome been different. It is thought that only the Franks were capable of opposing the professional and lethal cavalry of the Muslim invaders. After Martel's victory at Tours, the Caliphate would never again regain a foothold in Europe proper, instead being confined to Iberia. It would take another 700 years to rid [Europe] of the goat herders, but the eventual victory of Europe over Islam was set in motion by the heroism and genius of Charles "The Hammer" Martel. Perhaps no man was more important in the political structure and practices of Dark Ages Europe. Before Martel, Europe was a series of small fiefdoms with small, unprofessional, barbarian type military forces. [Martel] was the first since the fall of Rome to organize an army and lay the groundwork for a nation.
[Charles Martel's] genetic legacy is also outstanding. We all know that leaving behind strong and able sons is a big part of what goes into being a man. Legacies of great men like Alexander [the Great]...were not secured because of the lack of a legitimate heir. Unlike Alexander, Charles Martel's son Pippin the Younger, was recognized by the Church as the unquestioned leader of the Franks. He shared his father's vision of eradicating Islam from Europe and continued to battle the Moors in Gaul and Iberia. Most importantly, Pippin had a son named Charlemagne. If you don't know about the importance of Charlemagne, go read something. He may have been (next to his grandfather) the most important leader in Europe's history. Needless to say, Charles Martel made an impact in his own time and for centuries to come. Very few men can challenge his importance or legacy in Europe. Charles "The Hammer" Martel is unquestionably a legendary man, more than worthy of his selection as the Arthur's Hall Man of the Month. Hail the Hammer!
First published in Arthur's Hall of Viking Manliness on 2/28/09.
This guest column has it spot on! Far too few are brave enough in this politically correct age to hail the victory of Christian Europe over Islam, or to admit Islam's insatiable imperialism. Arthur did it and for that I give him a big slap on the back. You go Arthur! You are truly living in the spirit of Martel!
Showing posts with label Defense of the Realm. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Defense of the Realm. Show all posts
Saturday, October 10, 2009
Saturday, August 8, 2009
The Sultan Of Surrender, Part 2
The American president is at it again.
Overlooked amid the raucous debate that's erupted over his proposed health care reform, Barack Obama declared that America is no longer at war with jihadis but only with Al Qaeda terrorists who, of course, are jihadis. The incompetence of the American president is astounding, yet not all together surprising.
Barack Obama is a child of the American Left, a political crowd that, at best, has a love-hate relationship with their own country. The American Left, like the international Left, has never been able to bring itself to recognize Islamic terrorism for the threat that it is. To do that would mean leftists would have to jettison their whole paradigm for seeing the world. That paradigm places the West in general and America in particular at the center of all world unrest. In short, Islamic terrorism is the West's, particularly America's, fault. So believes the world Left. And the American president is beholden to them. He is one of them.
Barack Obama is not only the president of America, he is also the commander-in-chief of the American military. As such, he certainly has access to information showing what's really going on in the world. He may really want to fight radical Islam but if so, he wants to do it while remaining true to the paradigm described above. Hence these Orwellian word games.
America is no longer fighting terrorism; she's conducting "overseas contingency operations". And she's no longer at war with jihadis, only with Al Qaeda. Why? Because only Al Qaeda attacked America on September 11, 2001, says the Obama administration. But what about those non-Al Qaeda jihadis? Does Barack Obama think they will just change their beliefs and lay down their arms if America declares she's no longer at war with them? Apparently, yes. They have to, because the Left's paradigm says they're aggressive only in reaction to American/Western provocation. If America will--let's call it what it is--surrender, the other terrorists will drop their guns and go home. War over.
When the American people elected Barack Obama they elected a far-left true believer who's ambivalent, at best, about his country. Obama would never shout, "God damn America!" as did his good friend Jeremiah Wright, but the sentiments behind those words are his guiding principle. How, then, could he possibly want America to prevail even against Al Qaeda? Answer: he doesn't. Oh, Obama will play at defense. He'll talk tough and might even take some token action here and there, but victory won't be the goal. As a good leftist, the only thing Obama believes America deserves is defeat, and he'll work overtime to deliver. It'll be disguised as diplomacy, humility, reaching out to the world community, but it'll still be ignoble, self-inflicted defeat. That's all that Obama has the capacity to give. He's no commander-in-chief; he's the sultan of surrender. And we will all pay for that one day.
Overlooked amid the raucous debate that's erupted over his proposed health care reform, Barack Obama declared that America is no longer at war with jihadis but only with Al Qaeda terrorists who, of course, are jihadis. The incompetence of the American president is astounding, yet not all together surprising.
Barack Obama is a child of the American Left, a political crowd that, at best, has a love-hate relationship with their own country. The American Left, like the international Left, has never been able to bring itself to recognize Islamic terrorism for the threat that it is. To do that would mean leftists would have to jettison their whole paradigm for seeing the world. That paradigm places the West in general and America in particular at the center of all world unrest. In short, Islamic terrorism is the West's, particularly America's, fault. So believes the world Left. And the American president is beholden to them. He is one of them.
Barack Obama is not only the president of America, he is also the commander-in-chief of the American military. As such, he certainly has access to information showing what's really going on in the world. He may really want to fight radical Islam but if so, he wants to do it while remaining true to the paradigm described above. Hence these Orwellian word games.
America is no longer fighting terrorism; she's conducting "overseas contingency operations". And she's no longer at war with jihadis, only with Al Qaeda. Why? Because only Al Qaeda attacked America on September 11, 2001, says the Obama administration. But what about those non-Al Qaeda jihadis? Does Barack Obama think they will just change their beliefs and lay down their arms if America declares she's no longer at war with them? Apparently, yes. They have to, because the Left's paradigm says they're aggressive only in reaction to American/Western provocation. If America will--let's call it what it is--surrender, the other terrorists will drop their guns and go home. War over.
When the American people elected Barack Obama they elected a far-left true believer who's ambivalent, at best, about his country. Obama would never shout, "God damn America!" as did his good friend Jeremiah Wright, but the sentiments behind those words are his guiding principle. How, then, could he possibly want America to prevail even against Al Qaeda? Answer: he doesn't. Oh, Obama will play at defense. He'll talk tough and might even take some token action here and there, but victory won't be the goal. As a good leftist, the only thing Obama believes America deserves is defeat, and he'll work overtime to deliver. It'll be disguised as diplomacy, humility, reaching out to the world community, but it'll still be ignoble, self-inflicted defeat. That's all that Obama has the capacity to give. He's no commander-in-chief; he's the sultan of surrender. And we will all pay for that one day.
Tuesday, July 7, 2009
Pride And Remembrance
Today is July 7th, the fourth anniversary of the deadly London subway bombings. The bombings were perpetrated, of course, by Muslim terrorists. As we remember the innocents who died that day we Hesperians must also reawaken our courage and pride and resolve to fight for the survival of our civilization in the face of the Islamic threat .
The Muslim terrorists who attacked London want what the Muslim terrorists who attacked America on September 11 want: our destruction. They want the end of our Western Christian civilization. They purpose to achieve that end by either converting, subjugating, or killing us. And they are serious about it.
Muslims have a religion that tells them to conquer the world. Faithful Muslims seek to do that by the methods mentioned above, and by another method of conquest that's only recently opened up for tnem: immigration. Infiltration of our civilization through immigration is the Muslims' "nonviolent" jihad. The strategy is simple.
Muslims come here by the tens of thousands, and then increase their numbers even more through reproduction. As mostly non-White people, they then exploit our aversion to racism by claiming any opposition to them, their faith, or their radicalism is racist. As this specious accusation gathers steam, the Muslims just wait for us to have the expected reaction: a sickening round of brown nosing of Muslims to prove how non-racist we are. In a rush to show our racial enlightenment, we spit on our own heritage and glorify those who would conquer us. Slavishly adhering to the "anti-racist" doctrine of multiculturalism, we enthusiastically become participants in our own demise. I wish I could say the above strategy isn't working but, unfortunately, it is.
On this day we need to remember that we must honor the innocents who were slaughtered by Muslim killers four years ago. We can give them that honor by committing ourselves to the defense of our own culture, faith, heritage, and civilization. We must repudiate the debililitating left-wing belief that self-hatred is a virtue. Pride in who we are is the real virtue. And we in the West have much to be proud of. Don't let ANYONE tell you we don't.
In the spirit of Martel may we live!
The Muslim terrorists who attacked London want what the Muslim terrorists who attacked America on September 11 want: our destruction. They want the end of our Western Christian civilization. They purpose to achieve that end by either converting, subjugating, or killing us. And they are serious about it.
Muslims have a religion that tells them to conquer the world. Faithful Muslims seek to do that by the methods mentioned above, and by another method of conquest that's only recently opened up for tnem: immigration. Infiltration of our civilization through immigration is the Muslims' "nonviolent" jihad. The strategy is simple.
Muslims come here by the tens of thousands, and then increase their numbers even more through reproduction. As mostly non-White people, they then exploit our aversion to racism by claiming any opposition to them, their faith, or their radicalism is racist. As this specious accusation gathers steam, the Muslims just wait for us to have the expected reaction: a sickening round of brown nosing of Muslims to prove how non-racist we are. In a rush to show our racial enlightenment, we spit on our own heritage and glorify those who would conquer us. Slavishly adhering to the "anti-racist" doctrine of multiculturalism, we enthusiastically become participants in our own demise. I wish I could say the above strategy isn't working but, unfortunately, it is.
On this day we need to remember that we must honor the innocents who were slaughtered by Muslim killers four years ago. We can give them that honor by committing ourselves to the defense of our own culture, faith, heritage, and civilization. We must repudiate the debililitating left-wing belief that self-hatred is a virtue. Pride in who we are is the real virtue. And we in the West have much to be proud of. Don't let ANYONE tell you we don't.
In the spirit of Martel may we live!
Monday, April 6, 2009
The Sultan of Surrender
Barack Obama, the new American president, seems to be trying to pass Europeans in the race down the dhimmi brick road. In a speech before the Turkish parliament today, Obama declared that the US is not at war with Islam. He claimed that the great majority of Muslims have nothing in common with terrorist groups such as Al-Qaeda. He went on to claim that Muslims have "enriched America" and then touted his own Muslim roots. Obama then stated that he was converting to Islam and would replace the US Constitution with Sharia law. Just kidding. But not by much.
In his speech at the Democratic National Convention last year, Obama shouted with great passion, "Don't tell me Democrats don't want to defend America!". Well, I'm telling you, Democrats, led by Obama, don't want to defend America nor Western Christian civilization. The American president's performance in Turkey proved that. Not only did he grovel to Muslims but he took swipes at his own country. Obama dredged up America's past injustices to Blacks and Native Americans, as if that had anything to do with Muslims. He repudiated Gitmo and stated that, under his administration, America would not torture, all but saying that under the previous administration she had. This is a frightening shame.
Americans and Christian Westerners at large ARE at war with Islam, not because we want to be but because Islam chose to be at war with us. And Islam made that choice centuries ago. In 652 AD Arab Muslims first attacked Christian Sicily. In 717 AD Muslims laid seige for the first time to Constantinople, capital of the Byzantine (Eastern Roman) Christian Empire. In 711 Muslims began their conquest of Christian Spain and tried to conquer the rest of Europe but were stopped in France by Charles Martel in 732 AD. All of this Islamic aggression against the West occurred hundreds of years BEFORE the Crusades, Christendom's belated defensive wars that are always blamed for causing the animosity between the West and Islam. And Muslims kept attacking Europe for hundreds of years AFTER the Crusades, inflicting great oppression and suffering on the native Christian population. Obama mentioned none of this.
When Barack Obama spoke before the Turkish Parliament he spoke like the perfect dhimmi. He apologized for America's "sins" while not demanding or even expecting a reciprocal mea culpa from the Muslim world, even though one was definitely in order. Instead, he purposely left the impression that America, the West in general, is the only civilization to have done wrong in history. Obama did mention the Armenian genocide, but he didn't call it a genocide in deference to the Muslim Turks. He wasn't so concerned with the feelings of his fellow Christians, though, nor with historical truth.
Barack Obama is hailed by the American and international Left as a great new leader, the bringer of much needed change after the "arrogant" and "warmongering" Bush administration. And the Left is right. Barack Obama is leading a wave of change in America and the West, but it won't bring the results the Left is promising us. Obama's conciliatory, self-hating pose before the Islamic world will only breed contempt for us in the hearts of our Muslim enemies. They now see that not only is America, the world's lone super power, weak, but we are celebrating that weakness as a great leap forward. Obama has stepped onto the world stage as the Great Surrenderer and he's being lionized for it. The jihadis are watching, and we will pay...dearly.
In his speech at the Democratic National Convention last year, Obama shouted with great passion, "Don't tell me Democrats don't want to defend America!". Well, I'm telling you, Democrats, led by Obama, don't want to defend America nor Western Christian civilization. The American president's performance in Turkey proved that. Not only did he grovel to Muslims but he took swipes at his own country. Obama dredged up America's past injustices to Blacks and Native Americans, as if that had anything to do with Muslims. He repudiated Gitmo and stated that, under his administration, America would not torture, all but saying that under the previous administration she had. This is a frightening shame.
Americans and Christian Westerners at large ARE at war with Islam, not because we want to be but because Islam chose to be at war with us. And Islam made that choice centuries ago. In 652 AD Arab Muslims first attacked Christian Sicily. In 717 AD Muslims laid seige for the first time to Constantinople, capital of the Byzantine (Eastern Roman) Christian Empire. In 711 Muslims began their conquest of Christian Spain and tried to conquer the rest of Europe but were stopped in France by Charles Martel in 732 AD. All of this Islamic aggression against the West occurred hundreds of years BEFORE the Crusades, Christendom's belated defensive wars that are always blamed for causing the animosity between the West and Islam. And Muslims kept attacking Europe for hundreds of years AFTER the Crusades, inflicting great oppression and suffering on the native Christian population. Obama mentioned none of this.
When Barack Obama spoke before the Turkish Parliament he spoke like the perfect dhimmi. He apologized for America's "sins" while not demanding or even expecting a reciprocal mea culpa from the Muslim world, even though one was definitely in order. Instead, he purposely left the impression that America, the West in general, is the only civilization to have done wrong in history. Obama did mention the Armenian genocide, but he didn't call it a genocide in deference to the Muslim Turks. He wasn't so concerned with the feelings of his fellow Christians, though, nor with historical truth.
Barack Obama is hailed by the American and international Left as a great new leader, the bringer of much needed change after the "arrogant" and "warmongering" Bush administration. And the Left is right. Barack Obama is leading a wave of change in America and the West, but it won't bring the results the Left is promising us. Obama's conciliatory, self-hating pose before the Islamic world will only breed contempt for us in the hearts of our Muslim enemies. They now see that not only is America, the world's lone super power, weak, but we are celebrating that weakness as a great leap forward. Obama has stepped onto the world stage as the Great Surrenderer and he's being lionized for it. The jihadis are watching, and we will pay...dearly.
Saturday, December 20, 2008
Merry Dhimmitude!
I can't believe what I'm about to write here. No wait, I CAN believe it; I just don't want to. I came across this story on Angel's blog at Woman Honor Thyself and I thought I'd put my spin on it here. Read it and weep.
In Armonk, New York the Islamic star and crescent has been added to the village's Christmas display along with the Christmas tree and the menorah. Never mind that there isn't an Islamic holiday in December; the PC whipped townlet felt it was time to be inclusive--man I hate that word!--and celebrate all cultures during this Christian holiday. Actually, this wasn't the town's idea. Asad Jilani, a Muslim resident of Armonk, felt left out--poor thing!--and asked the village to include the symbol for his religion, you know, the one that inspires people the world over to murder "infidels", i.e. you and me. Such inclusiveness. All to promote peace, you see. Good, good, good vibrations!
When the star and crescent went up Jilani and two other townspeople expressed the majority opinion, calling the Islamic display "very attractive" and Armonk "magnificent" for being so open. The director of the Armonk Chamber of Commerce, Judy Wesley, was pleased at Armonk's "spirit of inclusion" and claimed that "Jesus Christ himself would have gathered everyone around Him." What ARE these people smoking?!?!
Let me explain something to the clueless, self-hating dhimmis of Armonk. Armonk is a town in New York. New York is a state in the United States of America. The U.S. of A is a country in Western civilization. The religious heritage of Western civilization is CHRISTIAN. During Christmas we Westerners celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ who gave us our Christian heritage. Christmas was never meant to be "inclusive". It is an expression of our great Judeo-Christian culture, a culture we should CHERISH, not submerge into a messy, multicultural composite.
The culture that should be celebrated in the West is Western culture, and it should be celebrated without apology. Islam is not part of our heritage, except when we fought against its efforts to conquer us. We have NO obligation to put the star and crescent in our Christmas displays or any where else, for that matter. And if Muslims complain? Tough. Their demands for tolerance and inclusion would have more credibility if they practiced those things themselves. How tolerant is the Islamic Republic of Iran, which hangs homosexuals? How inclusive is the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, where Islam is the only legal religion?
Instead of whining about being left out of our holiday festivities, Asad Jilani and other Western Muslims should be out protesting the tyranny and intolerance of Muslim societies. And we true Westerners should firmly reject unilateral tolerance, unilateral inclusiveness, and unilateral multiculturalism and recommit ourselves to pride in OUR OWN culture. We need to reawaken ourselves to the greatness of Western Christian civilization and fight for its survival. Otherwise "Merry Christmas" will be replaced with "Merry Dhimmitude".
In the Spirit of Martel may we live!
In Armonk, New York the Islamic star and crescent has been added to the village's Christmas display along with the Christmas tree and the menorah. Never mind that there isn't an Islamic holiday in December; the PC whipped townlet felt it was time to be inclusive--man I hate that word!--and celebrate all cultures during this Christian holiday. Actually, this wasn't the town's idea. Asad Jilani, a Muslim resident of Armonk, felt left out--poor thing!--and asked the village to include the symbol for his religion, you know, the one that inspires people the world over to murder "infidels", i.e. you and me. Such inclusiveness. All to promote peace, you see. Good, good, good vibrations!
When the star and crescent went up Jilani and two other townspeople expressed the majority opinion, calling the Islamic display "very attractive" and Armonk "magnificent" for being so open. The director of the Armonk Chamber of Commerce, Judy Wesley, was pleased at Armonk's "spirit of inclusion" and claimed that "Jesus Christ himself would have gathered everyone around Him." What ARE these people smoking?!?!
Let me explain something to the clueless, self-hating dhimmis of Armonk. Armonk is a town in New York. New York is a state in the United States of America. The U.S. of A is a country in Western civilization. The religious heritage of Western civilization is CHRISTIAN. During Christmas we Westerners celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ who gave us our Christian heritage. Christmas was never meant to be "inclusive". It is an expression of our great Judeo-Christian culture, a culture we should CHERISH, not submerge into a messy, multicultural composite.
The culture that should be celebrated in the West is Western culture, and it should be celebrated without apology. Islam is not part of our heritage, except when we fought against its efforts to conquer us. We have NO obligation to put the star and crescent in our Christmas displays or any where else, for that matter. And if Muslims complain? Tough. Their demands for tolerance and inclusion would have more credibility if they practiced those things themselves. How tolerant is the Islamic Republic of Iran, which hangs homosexuals? How inclusive is the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, where Islam is the only legal religion?
Instead of whining about being left out of our holiday festivities, Asad Jilani and other Western Muslims should be out protesting the tyranny and intolerance of Muslim societies. And we true Westerners should firmly reject unilateral tolerance, unilateral inclusiveness, and unilateral multiculturalism and recommit ourselves to pride in OUR OWN culture. We need to reawaken ourselves to the greatness of Western Christian civilization and fight for its survival. Otherwise "Merry Christmas" will be replaced with "Merry Dhimmitude".
In the Spirit of Martel may we live!
Thursday, August 21, 2008
Another Capitulation To Muslims
While watching The O'Reilly Factor last night I found out about another capitulation to the sensitive sensibilities of Muslims. It seems that Random House book publishing company has pulled the plug on a novel about the "romance" between the "prophet" Mohammed and his child bride Aisha, whom he married when she was six years old. Just days before the book, titled "The Jewel of Medina" (TJoM), was to be released Random House backed off, citing concerns that the novel might incite violence from the followers of the religion of peace. And what's really upsetting about this is that concern over the novel wasn't raised by Muslims but by University of Texas professor Denise Spellberg who, apparently, has appointed herself Protector of Islamic Feelings. And there are other such protectors around.
In Serbia--Serbia!--TJoM was pulled off bookstore shelves and the publisher apologized for publishing it after some Muslim group threatened to protest. When are we in the West going to stop doing this? Muslims kill us or threaten to kill us repeatedly; they oppress their religious and/or ethnic minorities; they execute homosexuals and "unchaste" women; they call for the destruction of an entire nation; yet we strain to be sensitive to their little feelings. This Spellberg person felt she had to warn Muslims about a novel that supposedly "made fun of [them] and their history". Ah yes, it's MUCH worse for a Westerner to make fun of Muslims than it is for Muslims to actually kill Westerners. You see, they wouldn't feel compelled to murder us if we understood them better. So goes the thinking of Quislings like Spellberg. I ask again, when are we in the West going to stop this?!
Freedom of speech used to be a cherished principle in Hesperia. Now, protecting Muslims' feelings is the highest good. What's wrong with a little censorship if it serves the cause of not offending Mohammed's followers? Isn't refraining from giving such offense the best way to prevent terrorism? The more we show Muslims that we like them, that we're on their side, to the point of violating our own rights and freedoms, then surely they'll drop this jihad nonsense and live in peace with us. Sherry Jones, the auther of TJoM, claimed that she wrote "respectfully" of the "great historical figures" Mohammed and Aisha, and that her book was meant to be a "bridge-builder" between Muslims and Westerners. Well Ms. Jones, just look at what your appeasement got you.
Muslims don't want to intergrate into Western civilization; they want to Islamize it. Appeasement emboldens them. They use fear of terrorist violence or mere protests to cow us Westerners into living by Islamic rules, chief of which is the rule that Islam, Mohammed, and Muslims must NEVER be offended. You can photograph a crucifix in a jar of urine. You can make an image of the Virgin Mary out of elephant dung. You can trash the Catholic church in books like "The Da Vinci Code" and mock evangelical Protestants in movies like "Saved!" and in inumerable tv shows. Freedom of speech absolutely allows that. But we must not think that freedom of speech protects criticism of Islam. What a warmongering notion!
Muslims will keep pushing and pushing the envelope until we wake up one morning and find that Sharia law has become the law of the land. I repeat, appeasement only emboldens them. It convinces Muslims that they can win because the West is too self-loathing to defend itself. Canadian author Mark Steyn, who had his own battle with protect-the-Muslims censorship, wrote that the future belongs to the fertile and the confident. We Westerners consistenly show that we are neither while Muslims are definitely both.
But all is not yet lost. There is reason for hope. Shortly after "The Jewel of Medina" was cancelled by Random House publishers in Italy, Spain, and Hungary bought rights to the book. Bravo to them! There are still those in the West who cherish our liberties and our civilization and will not be intimidated by Islam. The Italian, Spanish, and Hungarian publishers of TJoM will, no doubt, come in for such intimidation but I have a strong feeling that they will not cave. Their steadfastness will tell the Muslims that the Islamization of the West is not assured. There are still Westerners with the will and the guts to fight for their land. They are the Hammer Folk, the shield of Hesperia, and with God's help they will save Western civilization.
In the spirit of Martel may we live!
In Serbia--Serbia!--TJoM was pulled off bookstore shelves and the publisher apologized for publishing it after some Muslim group threatened to protest. When are we in the West going to stop doing this? Muslims kill us or threaten to kill us repeatedly; they oppress their religious and/or ethnic minorities; they execute homosexuals and "unchaste" women; they call for the destruction of an entire nation; yet we strain to be sensitive to their little feelings. This Spellberg person felt she had to warn Muslims about a novel that supposedly "made fun of [them] and their history". Ah yes, it's MUCH worse for a Westerner to make fun of Muslims than it is for Muslims to actually kill Westerners. You see, they wouldn't feel compelled to murder us if we understood them better. So goes the thinking of Quislings like Spellberg. I ask again, when are we in the West going to stop this?!
Freedom of speech used to be a cherished principle in Hesperia. Now, protecting Muslims' feelings is the highest good. What's wrong with a little censorship if it serves the cause of not offending Mohammed's followers? Isn't refraining from giving such offense the best way to prevent terrorism? The more we show Muslims that we like them, that we're on their side, to the point of violating our own rights and freedoms, then surely they'll drop this jihad nonsense and live in peace with us. Sherry Jones, the auther of TJoM, claimed that she wrote "respectfully" of the "great historical figures" Mohammed and Aisha, and that her book was meant to be a "bridge-builder" between Muslims and Westerners. Well Ms. Jones, just look at what your appeasement got you.
Muslims don't want to intergrate into Western civilization; they want to Islamize it. Appeasement emboldens them. They use fear of terrorist violence or mere protests to cow us Westerners into living by Islamic rules, chief of which is the rule that Islam, Mohammed, and Muslims must NEVER be offended. You can photograph a crucifix in a jar of urine. You can make an image of the Virgin Mary out of elephant dung. You can trash the Catholic church in books like "The Da Vinci Code" and mock evangelical Protestants in movies like "Saved!" and in inumerable tv shows. Freedom of speech absolutely allows that. But we must not think that freedom of speech protects criticism of Islam. What a warmongering notion!
Muslims will keep pushing and pushing the envelope until we wake up one morning and find that Sharia law has become the law of the land. I repeat, appeasement only emboldens them. It convinces Muslims that they can win because the West is too self-loathing to defend itself. Canadian author Mark Steyn, who had his own battle with protect-the-Muslims censorship, wrote that the future belongs to the fertile and the confident. We Westerners consistenly show that we are neither while Muslims are definitely both.
But all is not yet lost. There is reason for hope. Shortly after "The Jewel of Medina" was cancelled by Random House publishers in Italy, Spain, and Hungary bought rights to the book. Bravo to them! There are still those in the West who cherish our liberties and our civilization and will not be intimidated by Islam. The Italian, Spanish, and Hungarian publishers of TJoM will, no doubt, come in for such intimidation but I have a strong feeling that they will not cave. Their steadfastness will tell the Muslims that the Islamization of the West is not assured. There are still Westerners with the will and the guts to fight for their land. They are the Hammer Folk, the shield of Hesperia, and with God's help they will save Western civilization.
In the spirit of Martel may we live!
Friday, May 16, 2008
Chalk Up One For The Aussies!
I must admit I wasn't expecting this. I came across this startling information while surfing one of my favorite blogs, Woman Honor Thyself. Being shocked at what I read, I did a google search and discovered that WHT was right. And just what is it that had me staring at my computer screen in disbelief? The Australian government is taking legal action in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) against Iran's Ahmadenijad for inciting hatred against Israel. You read that right.
Australia's new prime minister, Kevin Rudd, is taking Iran's president to court! Rudd is making good on a campaign promise he made to Australia's Jewish community. Rudd said if elected he would take Ahmadenijad to court in the ICJ for inciting hatred against Jews, calling for the destruction of Israel, and denying the Holocaust. What makes this shocking is that Rudd is a center-left PM, the head of the Australian Labor Party. Such unabashed opposition to Iran from a left-leaning politcian is almost unheard of. What we usually get from them is a witch's brew of anti-Zionist and anti-American justifications for Islamic terrorism and anti-Semitism. Rudd is a refreshing change of pace.
What will become of Australia's lawsuit against Ahmadenijad? Will the International Court of Justice actually do anything to Iran? Probably not. I suspect that body will prove to be as impotent and anti-Western as the UN. Still, I'm jubilant that a country besides the United States and a leader besides George W. Bush sees the mullahs' Iran for the evil entity that it is. Chalk up one for Kevin Rudd! Chalk up one for the Aussies! Now if only the rest of Hesperia will get it.
Australia's new prime minister, Kevin Rudd, is taking Iran's president to court! Rudd is making good on a campaign promise he made to Australia's Jewish community. Rudd said if elected he would take Ahmadenijad to court in the ICJ for inciting hatred against Jews, calling for the destruction of Israel, and denying the Holocaust. What makes this shocking is that Rudd is a center-left PM, the head of the Australian Labor Party. Such unabashed opposition to Iran from a left-leaning politcian is almost unheard of. What we usually get from them is a witch's brew of anti-Zionist and anti-American justifications for Islamic terrorism and anti-Semitism. Rudd is a refreshing change of pace.
What will become of Australia's lawsuit against Ahmadenijad? Will the International Court of Justice actually do anything to Iran? Probably not. I suspect that body will prove to be as impotent and anti-Western as the UN. Still, I'm jubilant that a country besides the United States and a leader besides George W. Bush sees the mullahs' Iran for the evil entity that it is. Chalk up one for Kevin Rudd! Chalk up one for the Aussies! Now if only the rest of Hesperia will get it.
Tuesday, February 19, 2008
No Money For You, Missie
It seems that the Danes need to donate some of their courage to their Germanic cousins, the Dutch. While Denmark is standing firm against violent Islamic efforts to squash freedom of speech, the Netherlands is refusing to continue to protect one of it's most prominent citizens from Islamic aggression.
Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a Somali-born Dutch citizen and former MP, has lived under armed guard since the 2004 murder of Theo Van Gogh, with whom she made an anti-Islamic film. The Dutch government recently stopped paying for Ali's security, forcing her to appear before the European Parliament (EP) on Valentine's Day to plead for aid. The cost of her security, Ali explained, "is beyond anything I can pay". The EP referred her request to a committee. Encouragingly, some French MPs offered French citizenship to Ali so the French government could protect her. I don't know if Ali accepted their proposal.
This entire episode is an outrage! It should arouse fierce anger in the heart of every Dutch national and every member of the Hammer Folk. The Dutch government has thrown one of its own to the wolves. If Ali doesn't immigrate to France or some other country willing to protect her, she's a dead woman. The jihadis would've succeeded in frightening a Western government out of it's most sacred duty: defending its people. If this proves to be the case, Europe is doomed. Denmark can't stop the Islamic horde alone. Join me in praying the Netherlands will revive its courage and stand against Islamic darkness. All our lives, not just Ayaan Hirsi Ali's, depend on it.
Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a Somali-born Dutch citizen and former MP, has lived under armed guard since the 2004 murder of Theo Van Gogh, with whom she made an anti-Islamic film. The Dutch government recently stopped paying for Ali's security, forcing her to appear before the European Parliament (EP) on Valentine's Day to plead for aid. The cost of her security, Ali explained, "is beyond anything I can pay". The EP referred her request to a committee. Encouragingly, some French MPs offered French citizenship to Ali so the French government could protect her. I don't know if Ali accepted their proposal.
This entire episode is an outrage! It should arouse fierce anger in the heart of every Dutch national and every member of the Hammer Folk. The Dutch government has thrown one of its own to the wolves. If Ali doesn't immigrate to France or some other country willing to protect her, she's a dead woman. The jihadis would've succeeded in frightening a Western government out of it's most sacred duty: defending its people. If this proves to be the case, Europe is doomed. Denmark can't stop the Islamic horde alone. Join me in praying the Netherlands will revive its courage and stand against Islamic darkness. All our lives, not just Ayaan Hirsi Ali's, depend on it.
Saturday, February 16, 2008
Here's What You Want, Archbishop!
Well, well, Mr. Williams. So you want Sharia law in Britain, huh? Then take a look at a recent happening in Gaza so you can give your fellow Britons an accurate sermon on what they can expect if you should get your way.
In Gaza 16 Palestinian Muslims broke into a YMCA, stole everything but the Y's books, then set the building on fire with an explosive device, destroying thousands of books. The attackers were members of Hamas and it's ally organization Popular Resistance Committees. This isn't the first attack on Gazan Christians since Hamas took power in the territory last June. In October of '07 Rami Ayyad, manager of Gaza's only Christian bookstore, was abducted, tortured, and murdered. He had begun receiving death threats, and his store was firebombed, in April. And in September grenades were lobbed at a church.
Sheik Abu Saqer, leader of the group Jihadia Salafiya which carried out the attacks on Ayyad's store and the church, claimed the Y was proselytizing because it had some Muslim children in its nursery. He also said that "missionary activity" was "endangering the Christian community in Gaza." Hmmm. Christians are attacked and murdered and their churches and institutions bombed by Muslims but the Christians are to blame. They are endangering themselves by "proselytizing". But not to worry! Christians can live in peace in Gaza, said Sheik Saqer, so long as they accept Islamic law, including women being covered in public. What a relief!
This is what you want in Britain, Archbishop. Don't kid yourself. There is no such thing as a liberal, Westernized Sharia law. Honor killing, burqas, and bombings of churches is what Sharia is all about. That you would hand over your country and your congregation to this fanaticism is a testimony to your stupidity, cowardice, and self-hatred. You are no Englishman. You are no Hesperian. And you are no Christian. You serve the cause of cultural suicide not the cause of Christ. You are a heretic of the highest order and a traitor to your nation. May God remove you from your authority before you can persuade others to your malicious opinion. That is the only thing that will save Britain. Please God, save Britain!
In Gaza 16 Palestinian Muslims broke into a YMCA, stole everything but the Y's books, then set the building on fire with an explosive device, destroying thousands of books. The attackers were members of Hamas and it's ally organization Popular Resistance Committees. This isn't the first attack on Gazan Christians since Hamas took power in the territory last June. In October of '07 Rami Ayyad, manager of Gaza's only Christian bookstore, was abducted, tortured, and murdered. He had begun receiving death threats, and his store was firebombed, in April. And in September grenades were lobbed at a church.
Sheik Abu Saqer, leader of the group Jihadia Salafiya which carried out the attacks on Ayyad's store and the church, claimed the Y was proselytizing because it had some Muslim children in its nursery. He also said that "missionary activity" was "endangering the Christian community in Gaza." Hmmm. Christians are attacked and murdered and their churches and institutions bombed by Muslims but the Christians are to blame. They are endangering themselves by "proselytizing". But not to worry! Christians can live in peace in Gaza, said Sheik Saqer, so long as they accept Islamic law, including women being covered in public. What a relief!
This is what you want in Britain, Archbishop. Don't kid yourself. There is no such thing as a liberal, Westernized Sharia law. Honor killing, burqas, and bombings of churches is what Sharia is all about. That you would hand over your country and your congregation to this fanaticism is a testimony to your stupidity, cowardice, and self-hatred. You are no Englishman. You are no Hesperian. And you are no Christian. You serve the cause of cultural suicide not the cause of Christ. You are a heretic of the highest order and a traitor to your nation. May God remove you from your authority before you can persuade others to your malicious opinion. That is the only thing that will save Britain. Please God, save Britain!
Wednesday, January 16, 2008
Why Do They Come Here?
The murder of sisters Amina and Sarah Said, most likely by their father, not only shocked and sickened me but also prompted me to revisit a question I've asked myself before. If Muslims hate the West so much; if they think we are so decadent and so hateful toward Islam then why do they come here?
The Said sisters' father, an Egyptian immigrant, presumably murdered them because they had become too Western for his liking. Yet what did he expect when raising his children in America, in the West? If Yaser Abdel Said wanted his daughters to be proper Muslim maidens he should've stayed in Egypt and reared them there. In the US he could give his children a Muslim upbringing at home but the expectation that his Islamic values would be reinforced by society was tragically misplaced.
The West is not an Islamic civilization. The Koran is not the foundation of our culture. Yet Muslims come here and have the audacity to get angry that we don't think and live like they do.
They disdain our culture and our values, yet they are coming to Hesperia in record numbers. Again we must ask, why?
Some Muslims immigrate to Western countries simply for a better life, like other Third World residents. But I believe there is more going on with Islamic immigration than that. Islam is an inherently expansionist religion. It's ultimate goal is global domination, an Islamic world. And jihad is the method. We know all to well about violent jihad but Muslims also practice what they call "peaceful" jihad, which aims aren't very peaceful to non-Muslims.
The goal of global Islamic domination will be realized when the majority of the world practices the Islamic faith and/or is under Muslim political control. But how can Islam be spread into the West? Immigration! Immigration is the tip of the spear of peaceful jihad. Through immigration Muslims seek to establish in Western countries a beachhead from which to expand further into our lands. As their numbers grow Muslims strengthen their community even more through a high birthrate and conversion. Reproduction and conversion are weapons two and three in Islam's "peaceful" invasion of the Realm.
As their population explodes Muslims are beginning to flex their muscles culturally and politically. In some European countries Muslims are demanding the right to use Sharia law to adjudicate disputes in their communities. Honor killings are taking place in Europe and, possibly, America. In Sweden and Australia Muslim men have raped White women and used Islamic values to justify it, saying the women were to blame because they weren't wearing hijab. Some cowed Western intellectuals and politicians are now opining that any criticism of Islam is racism. And the Muslim muscle flexing doesn't stop there.
Western Muslims are using our cherished freedoms against us. Our freedoms of religion and speech, for instance, are being exploited by many imams to preach violent, anti-Western sermons in their mosques. Muslims are using the right to protest to hold mass demonstrations to influence Western governments' policies. Democracy has allowed Muslims to elect their co-religionists to political office where they will use their power to further Islamize our society. Any attempt to oppose this Islamization process is denounced as "Islamophobia".
Many Westerners desperately hope that exercising political freedoms will instill in Muslims a commitment to liberal, secular democracy. They are wrong. Democracy, or the exploitation thereof, is the fourth weapon in the "peaceful" jihad. But democracy, reproduction and conversion are useless weapons if Muslims aren't in the West to implement them here. Which brings us back to immigration, the weapon that opens the door to all the others. Why do Muslims come here? Now you know.
The Said sisters' father, an Egyptian immigrant, presumably murdered them because they had become too Western for his liking. Yet what did he expect when raising his children in America, in the West? If Yaser Abdel Said wanted his daughters to be proper Muslim maidens he should've stayed in Egypt and reared them there. In the US he could give his children a Muslim upbringing at home but the expectation that his Islamic values would be reinforced by society was tragically misplaced.
The West is not an Islamic civilization. The Koran is not the foundation of our culture. Yet Muslims come here and have the audacity to get angry that we don't think and live like they do.
They disdain our culture and our values, yet they are coming to Hesperia in record numbers. Again we must ask, why?
Some Muslims immigrate to Western countries simply for a better life, like other Third World residents. But I believe there is more going on with Islamic immigration than that. Islam is an inherently expansionist religion. It's ultimate goal is global domination, an Islamic world. And jihad is the method. We know all to well about violent jihad but Muslims also practice what they call "peaceful" jihad, which aims aren't very peaceful to non-Muslims.
The goal of global Islamic domination will be realized when the majority of the world practices the Islamic faith and/or is under Muslim political control. But how can Islam be spread into the West? Immigration! Immigration is the tip of the spear of peaceful jihad. Through immigration Muslims seek to establish in Western countries a beachhead from which to expand further into our lands. As their numbers grow Muslims strengthen their community even more through a high birthrate and conversion. Reproduction and conversion are weapons two and three in Islam's "peaceful" invasion of the Realm.
As their population explodes Muslims are beginning to flex their muscles culturally and politically. In some European countries Muslims are demanding the right to use Sharia law to adjudicate disputes in their communities. Honor killings are taking place in Europe and, possibly, America. In Sweden and Australia Muslim men have raped White women and used Islamic values to justify it, saying the women were to blame because they weren't wearing hijab. Some cowed Western intellectuals and politicians are now opining that any criticism of Islam is racism. And the Muslim muscle flexing doesn't stop there.
Western Muslims are using our cherished freedoms against us. Our freedoms of religion and speech, for instance, are being exploited by many imams to preach violent, anti-Western sermons in their mosques. Muslims are using the right to protest to hold mass demonstrations to influence Western governments' policies. Democracy has allowed Muslims to elect their co-religionists to political office where they will use their power to further Islamize our society. Any attempt to oppose this Islamization process is denounced as "Islamophobia".
Many Westerners desperately hope that exercising political freedoms will instill in Muslims a commitment to liberal, secular democracy. They are wrong. Democracy, or the exploitation thereof, is the fourth weapon in the "peaceful" jihad. But democracy, reproduction and conversion are useless weapons if Muslims aren't in the West to implement them here. Which brings us back to immigration, the weapon that opens the door to all the others. Why do Muslims come here? Now you know.
Saturday, January 12, 2008
In My Backyard?
On the evening of Tuesday, January 1--New Year's day--something horrible happened in my state of Texas. Two sisters, 18-year-old Amina and 17-year-old Sarah Said were found shot to death in a taxi cab. The suspected killer? Their father, Yaser Abdel Said. Any time a parent murders a child it's tragic, but what makes the murder of Amina and Sarah even more horrific is that it's probably an honor killing.
Yaser Said is an Egyptian immigrant and devout Muslim who was known to be upset with his daughters' Westernized lifestyle. He was particularly angered by the fact that the sisters both had non-Muslim boyfriends. In fact Sarah, the younger sister, told a friend that if her Dad found out about her boyfriend he'd kill her. The girls' mother was scared enough to flee with them to Kansas and then to Tulsa, Oklahoma where she rented an apartment under an assumed name, according to the sisters' great aunt Gail Gattrell. How and why Amina and Sarah ended up back in Texas is a mystery, at least for now.
The murder of the sisters hasn't been officially ruled an honor killing. Yaser Abdel Said is still at large so all the facts of the case are not yet known. In spite of his religious devoutness Said may just be one of those ultramacho, ultracontrolling, latently incestous, psycho dads and would've killed his daughters even if he'd been an atheist. The circumstantial evidence, though, screams honor killing.
It's shocking that an honor killing may have happened in my state, close to my city. Frankly, I always thought that we Texans were too "narrow-minded"--in a good way!--for a backward, Islamic custom to be practiced here. I always expected this sort of thing to happen in liberal, "enlightened", meccas of multiculturalism like California or Massachusetts. But now that it appears that the barbaric practice of honor killing has reared its ugly head in the Lone Star state I hope that my fellow Texans will join me in saying loudly and with firm resolve, "NOT IN OUR BACKYARD!!!!" We owe it to Amina and Sarah to make sure this diabolical crime NEVER happens again.
Rest in peace, beautiful sisters.
Wednesday, October 31, 2007
Remembering the Victims of Stalin
I can't believe I forgot about this, but I did. This year, 2007, marks the 70th anniversary of Stalin's Great Purges, which resulted in the deaths of millions of people. While this blog was created primarily to combat the Islamist threat to the West, Hammer Folk Woman is a forum of resistance to ALL enemies of Western Christian civilization. One of the most viscious, murderous, and insidious of those enemies is Communism.
The Godless, totalitarian scourge that is Communism first gained hold of a nation, Russia, in November* 1917, and the Soviet Union was born. After WWII the Soviets spread the disease into Eastern Europe, China, and other parts of the world. Communists murdered mercilessly everywhere they gained total power. The model for the killing was the Soviet Union, especially under Stalin. The Great Purges, also known as The Great Terror, was Stalin's masterpiece of totalitarian madness.
The Purges, or the Terror, didn't began in 1937 but reached a fever pitch in that year. It's purpose was to crush all opposition to Stalin's power and personality cult. Initially, only "traitorous" Communist Party members were targeted but the killing quickly spread to all walks of life. When it reached it's peak The Terror had consumed millions of lives and given birth to the world's most infamous prison system: the Gulag.
As horrifying as Stalin's Terror was most people today know little or nothing about it. It was a time in Hesperia's past when more people were slaughtered than in the Holocaust, yet it's all but hidden from history. The Hammer Folk will not let this crime against humanity be forgotten. We will remember it. We will remember the victims. Their blood cries out to us from their graves: Never again! Never again the Gulag! Never again The Terror! Never again. Never again. With every fiber of our being we will make it so.
*The Communists' seizure of power took place in October according to the old Julian calender then in use in Russia, that's why it's called the October Revolution.
The Godless, totalitarian scourge that is Communism first gained hold of a nation, Russia, in November* 1917, and the Soviet Union was born. After WWII the Soviets spread the disease into Eastern Europe, China, and other parts of the world. Communists murdered mercilessly everywhere they gained total power. The model for the killing was the Soviet Union, especially under Stalin. The Great Purges, also known as The Great Terror, was Stalin's masterpiece of totalitarian madness.
The Purges, or the Terror, didn't began in 1937 but reached a fever pitch in that year. It's purpose was to crush all opposition to Stalin's power and personality cult. Initially, only "traitorous" Communist Party members were targeted but the killing quickly spread to all walks of life. When it reached it's peak The Terror had consumed millions of lives and given birth to the world's most infamous prison system: the Gulag.
As horrifying as Stalin's Terror was most people today know little or nothing about it. It was a time in Hesperia's past when more people were slaughtered than in the Holocaust, yet it's all but hidden from history. The Hammer Folk will not let this crime against humanity be forgotten. We will remember it. We will remember the victims. Their blood cries out to us from their graves: Never again! Never again the Gulag! Never again The Terror! Never again. Never again. With every fiber of our being we will make it so.
*The Communists' seizure of power took place in October according to the old Julian calender then in use in Russia, that's why it's called the October Revolution.
Sunday, July 1, 2007
The Poison of Multiculturalism
In my previous post I briefly mentioned the doctrine of multicultualism and how it's emasculating the West. I'm not the only Westerner who sees this danger. Other of my fellow Hesperians also see the danger and sound the alarm far more skillfully than I can. I'd like to share one such warning with you. Below is an excerpt from Diana West's Townhall.com article "Burnt Offerings on the Altar of Multiculturalism". It is copied from the June issue of the Christian magazine SALT.
Only one faith on Earth may be more messiaic than Islam: multicultualism. Without it--without its fanatics who believe all civilizations are the same--the engine that projects Islam into the unprotected heart of Western civilization would stall and fail. It's as simple as that. To live among the believers--the multiculturalists--is to watch the assault, the jihad, take place un-repulsed by our suicidal societies. These societies are not doomed to submit; rather, they are eager to do so in the name of a masochistic brand of tolerance that, short of drastic measures, is surely terminal.
I'm not talking about our soldiers, policemen, rescue workers, and now, even train conductors, who bravely and steadfastly risk their lives for civilization abroad and at home. Instead, I'm thinking about who we are as a society at this somewhat advanced stage of war. It is a strange, tentative civilization we have become, with leaders who strut their promises of "no surrender" even as they flinch at indentifying the foe. Four years past 9/11, we continue to shadow-box "terror", even as we go on about "an ideology of hate". It's a script that smacks of sci-fi fantasy more than realpolitik....
In not discussing the roots of teror in Islam itself, in not learning about them, the multicultural clergy that shepherds our elites prevenst us from having to to anything about them. This is key, because any serious action--stopping immigration from jihad-sponsoring naitons, shutting down mosques that preach violence and expelling their imams, just for starters--means to renounce the multicultural creed. In the West, that's the greatest apostasy. And while the penalty is not death--as it is for leaving Islam under Islamic law--the existential crisis is to be avoided at all costs. Including extinction.
Pretty potent stuff. The Hammer Folk, the spiritual descendants of Muslim fighter and defender of Christendom Charles Martel, must take Ms. West's words to heart and rise to defend Hesperia by all means necessary. The only things that need to be extinct are multiculturalism and jihad. God willing, they soon will be.
Only one faith on Earth may be more messiaic than Islam: multicultualism. Without it--without its fanatics who believe all civilizations are the same--the engine that projects Islam into the unprotected heart of Western civilization would stall and fail. It's as simple as that. To live among the believers--the multiculturalists--is to watch the assault, the jihad, take place un-repulsed by our suicidal societies. These societies are not doomed to submit; rather, they are eager to do so in the name of a masochistic brand of tolerance that, short of drastic measures, is surely terminal.
I'm not talking about our soldiers, policemen, rescue workers, and now, even train conductors, who bravely and steadfastly risk their lives for civilization abroad and at home. Instead, I'm thinking about who we are as a society at this somewhat advanced stage of war. It is a strange, tentative civilization we have become, with leaders who strut their promises of "no surrender" even as they flinch at indentifying the foe. Four years past 9/11, we continue to shadow-box "terror", even as we go on about "an ideology of hate". It's a script that smacks of sci-fi fantasy more than realpolitik....
In not discussing the roots of teror in Islam itself, in not learning about them, the multicultural clergy that shepherds our elites prevenst us from having to to anything about them. This is key, because any serious action--stopping immigration from jihad-sponsoring naitons, shutting down mosques that preach violence and expelling their imams, just for starters--means to renounce the multicultural creed. In the West, that's the greatest apostasy. And while the penalty is not death--as it is for leaving Islam under Islamic law--the existential crisis is to be avoided at all costs. Including extinction.
Pretty potent stuff. The Hammer Folk, the spiritual descendants of Muslim fighter and defender of Christendom Charles Martel, must take Ms. West's words to heart and rise to defend Hesperia by all means necessary. The only things that need to be extinct are multiculturalism and jihad. God willing, they soon will be.
Saturday, June 30, 2007
Deport the Jihadis!
When I turned on my television today I was confronted with a fiery scene at Glasgow International Airport in Glasgow, Scotland. Two men in a van had tried to ram the gasoline-laden vehicle into one of the airport terminals. Thankfully, barriers prevented the would-be killers from reaching their target. This attempted attack comes on the heels of the attempted double car bombing of nightclubs in London a couple of days ago.
At last check, British authorities didn't know, or weren't saying, if the airport terrorists are connected with Al Quaeda or are freelance copycats. Of course, it really doesn't matter. Muslims want to attack the West and kill Westerners because their religion tells them to, not because Al Quaeda tells them to. The only question is: will Hesperia fight back?
Oh, we'll fight back in a limited fashion. The airport terrorists are already in custody and if convicted will no doubt get long prison sentences. Most people will think the matter has been dealt with and will move on to other things--until the next attack. Hesperia will not survive if it keeps on playing this passive, reactionary role. We Westerners have no moral obligation to wait to be attacked before we defend ourselves. Going on the offensive isn't just a moral imperative, it's strategically crucial for our victory over jihad. And it doesn't always have to mean attacking Muslim countries.
One very important way Westerners can be preemptive is by changing the way we view our own civilization. Our Realm is just that, OUR Realm. Outsiders live here at our discretion and can stay only if they commit themselves to Western culture and values. This runs contrary to the doctrine of multiculturalism, but when multicultualism requires that Western people disown their own heritage and renders them unwilling or unable to defend it, then multiculturalism has to go. Love for and pride in our own culture are nothing to be ashamed of.
Once we understand that living in the Realm is a privilege and not a right, we'll be able to take the steps necessary to protect our home. We must no longer wait for the enemy to attack; we must root out the enemy from among us. Infiltrating mosques and Muslim charities is job one. Mosques and charities shouldn't be targeted willy-nilly, but if there's good intelligence that a particular mosque or charity is spewing jihadism, then it should be spied on. Once it's determined which mosque or charity leaders are teaching radicalism, they should be deported. Period. No hearing. No trail. If they're preaching hatred of the West, they don't belong here, even if they were born here. This applies not only to ethnic Muslims but also to ethnic Westerners who've converted to Islam. If Cat Stevens, for instance, was discovered preaching hatred toward Hesperia, he should be kicked out. His belief in jihad would automatically disqualify him from living here. It's time to play hardball.
Liberals will scream that deporting people for what they believe violates their human rights and you know what? They're right. But during WWII American president and liberal god Franklin Delano Roosevelt interned thousands of Japanese, Germans, and Italians, many of them American citizens, in camps in order to protect his country from sabotage. Roosevelt understood that when the very survival of your country is at stake, civil liberties can be compromised. How much more true that is when an entire civilization is at stake.
No, I'm not saying that fighting the jihadis gives Western leaders the right to arrest, spy on, or otherwise abuse their citizens for trivial reasons. There has to be a reasonable suspicion that a mosque, charity, or an individual Muslim is teaching jihad before any infiltration or spying should occur. But once the spying produces evidence of anti-Western hatred or support for jihad among the targeted Muslims, deportation should result. If a homeowner discovered that an outsider he allowed into his home planned to kill his family he has a moral duty to kick that person out of his house even before he calls the police. Well, the Realm is our civilizational home and we have the same moral duty to eliminate any internal dangers to her and our lives.
Besides, the Muslims thus deported will be leaving a culture they hate, a culture they believe is decadent, Godless, and hopelessly hostile to Islam. You have to wonder why the jihadis among us don't just leave of their own accord. Perhaps it's because they take their task of conquering the West very seriously and know that it can't be done solely by bombing American and British soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. Immigration, the "peaceful" jihad, is a crucial tactic in the jihadis plan for victory. We can thwart it by removing the jihadis in our midst and not allowing any others to come in. That's what our survival demands; that's what the Hammer Folk will do.
God bless Hesperia! God bless the Realm! God bless the Hammer Folk!
At last check, British authorities didn't know, or weren't saying, if the airport terrorists are connected with Al Quaeda or are freelance copycats. Of course, it really doesn't matter. Muslims want to attack the West and kill Westerners because their religion tells them to, not because Al Quaeda tells them to. The only question is: will Hesperia fight back?
Oh, we'll fight back in a limited fashion. The airport terrorists are already in custody and if convicted will no doubt get long prison sentences. Most people will think the matter has been dealt with and will move on to other things--until the next attack. Hesperia will not survive if it keeps on playing this passive, reactionary role. We Westerners have no moral obligation to wait to be attacked before we defend ourselves. Going on the offensive isn't just a moral imperative, it's strategically crucial for our victory over jihad. And it doesn't always have to mean attacking Muslim countries.
One very important way Westerners can be preemptive is by changing the way we view our own civilization. Our Realm is just that, OUR Realm. Outsiders live here at our discretion and can stay only if they commit themselves to Western culture and values. This runs contrary to the doctrine of multiculturalism, but when multicultualism requires that Western people disown their own heritage and renders them unwilling or unable to defend it, then multiculturalism has to go. Love for and pride in our own culture are nothing to be ashamed of.
Once we understand that living in the Realm is a privilege and not a right, we'll be able to take the steps necessary to protect our home. We must no longer wait for the enemy to attack; we must root out the enemy from among us. Infiltrating mosques and Muslim charities is job one. Mosques and charities shouldn't be targeted willy-nilly, but if there's good intelligence that a particular mosque or charity is spewing jihadism, then it should be spied on. Once it's determined which mosque or charity leaders are teaching radicalism, they should be deported. Period. No hearing. No trail. If they're preaching hatred of the West, they don't belong here, even if they were born here. This applies not only to ethnic Muslims but also to ethnic Westerners who've converted to Islam. If Cat Stevens, for instance, was discovered preaching hatred toward Hesperia, he should be kicked out. His belief in jihad would automatically disqualify him from living here. It's time to play hardball.
Liberals will scream that deporting people for what they believe violates their human rights and you know what? They're right. But during WWII American president and liberal god Franklin Delano Roosevelt interned thousands of Japanese, Germans, and Italians, many of them American citizens, in camps in order to protect his country from sabotage. Roosevelt understood that when the very survival of your country is at stake, civil liberties can be compromised. How much more true that is when an entire civilization is at stake.
No, I'm not saying that fighting the jihadis gives Western leaders the right to arrest, spy on, or otherwise abuse their citizens for trivial reasons. There has to be a reasonable suspicion that a mosque, charity, or an individual Muslim is teaching jihad before any infiltration or spying should occur. But once the spying produces evidence of anti-Western hatred or support for jihad among the targeted Muslims, deportation should result. If a homeowner discovered that an outsider he allowed into his home planned to kill his family he has a moral duty to kick that person out of his house even before he calls the police. Well, the Realm is our civilizational home and we have the same moral duty to eliminate any internal dangers to her and our lives.
Besides, the Muslims thus deported will be leaving a culture they hate, a culture they believe is decadent, Godless, and hopelessly hostile to Islam. You have to wonder why the jihadis among us don't just leave of their own accord. Perhaps it's because they take their task of conquering the West very seriously and know that it can't be done solely by bombing American and British soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. Immigration, the "peaceful" jihad, is a crucial tactic in the jihadis plan for victory. We can thwart it by removing the jihadis in our midst and not allowing any others to come in. That's what our survival demands; that's what the Hammer Folk will do.
God bless Hesperia! God bless the Realm! God bless the Hammer Folk!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
